|
Oh crap, I always sucked at analyzing things - I've always been more of an intuitive thinking, first impression kind of girl. I think.
But sometimes intuition and first impressions don't get you there. My first reaction was that the half a guy thing was wrong. But I figured he was left in there on purpose so I looked at the photo again.
I realized that the picture would be rather uninteresting and sterile only showing the bridge and the running water. The guy brings movement to it, and that fits in with the function of a bridege, i.e. it's for travelling over or under, for things in motion. The guy needs to be faceless and unidentifiable as an individual because this isn't about him, per se, but the backpack fits in with the travelling idea.
Then again, the photo could have had nothing to do with what I said above. The title might indicate a correlation between the state of the bridge and the state of nature - both are kind of dying, the bridge by crumbling to pieces, and nature by shedding the leaves on the trees in preparation for winter. However, that doesn't explain the guy, unless his leaving the picture has something to do with the death thing.
I told you, I've always sucked at analyzing things. ;-)
Still, assuming this is probably nothing like what you had in mind, that's all right too, because even if you had something totally different in mind, you can't dictate what the spectator sees in the photo - you can certainly indicate it by giving clues, either subtly or blatantly, but in the end, the reaction is in the mind of the spectator who may or may not see the same thing as you did.
And even if I got everything wrong, the picture nevertheless made me think, even if it wasn't the "right" thinking. In that sense, it's a great success.
|